Thus, it is crucial to understand that the standard language forms are not universal, and they can still have varieties across different regions. Structural Features of Language and Language Use ... of standardization in technical set-tings. For instance, the use of double negatives – ‘that won’t do you no good’ – is deemed confusing, redundant and incorrect by the masses. Vol. Milroy, James. Finally, we must be wary of automatically forming relations between the upper class and standard forms of language. Learn more. Language educators were also deeply motivated to teach the standard Basque. Continuum, 2010, Peter Trudgill, Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society, 4th ed. However, as the use of ‘h’ were valued by the northern Basque writers and speakers, Mitxelena saw the importance of its inclusion in the standard language. Critics. The goal of standardization is to ensure uniformity to certain practices within the industry. Another quality of a good assessment is standardization. Overall, the whole process aims to create a ‘melting pot’ environment, homogenising a certain culture that comes with the language. The Basque case study is significant not only for the fact that it is relatively recent but that it also reflects Milroy & Milroy’s conception that a language standard is not an end-product to be achieved, but rather, it is a process of development that the society embarks on. Routledge, 2000. What is language standardisation? Selection. It is the choices societies make that result in differing languages. The standard language is a planned and designed unitary referential variant the purpose of which is to provide cultural, political, and social cohesion on the territory on which it is official. We need not thinkof them as being chronological. British Library Board. The confluence of diverse cultures and perspectives within a territory serves as one explanation for the evolution of language. The term re-standardization refers to the ways in which a language may be reshaped by its speakers and writers. The process of standardisation involves both ‘ruler-makers’ and ‘rule-breakers’; the former makes the rules for spelling and pronunciation, in addition to selecting/eliminating the meaning of commonly used words. These steps or stages in corpus development are also seen as paralleled by policy development, and some analysts enumerate these steps in language policy planning (Eastman 1983:12): . Once it has gained general approval, the standard language is rigorously maintained through several means. He had stressed on the fact that “Basque should move towards unification, and unification should commence chiefly with matters of form” (Elkartea 36). It is an ongoing historical process that develops a standard written and oral language to be practiced by everyone in a society. As such, standard forms of language can differ at different points in time, even within the same society. Among, 431 publications made between 1967 and 1977, only 3.3% of books published in 1967 had incorporated the new rules of spelling, declined and conjugated forms. Language standardization is the process by which conventional forms of a language are established and maintained. Language standardization is the process by which conventional forms of a language are established and maintained. Crystal, David. In addition, standard languages are also discursive projects, and standardization processes are typically accompanied by the development of specific discourse practices. These characteristics of language set human language apart from animal communication. Leith, Dick. With every generation, new words are constantly invented and introduced into the language lexicon, which may then be taught to the next generation (Crystal 132). Furthermore, it creates a sort of ignorance towards other dialects and ways of speaking. It is a three-step process of standardising literacy/script, vocabulary, and then digital rendering (i.e. A&C Black. (domains, timetables, territorial extent, etc.) Another interesting point relates to the superiority of specific language forms. John Benjamins, 2004. Standardization in language, as distinct from script or notation, comea out of these two features, variation in speech and association of language with overtones of social and personal origins. Charlemagne mandated it for his whole empire. They believed that the promotion of the standard was “essential to turn Basque into a modern instrument”, 61% of the 196 Basque writers that were interviewed used the standard language in their writings for they believed in the “need to convert the language into an instrument of culture”. Rihanna’s ‘Work’ Lyrics Use Creole & Patois, Totally Confusing Music. Is the process of development of a standard for written and/or oral language It occurs in a specific manner that depends on the community and the social, historical and geographic aspects involved. More people speak a variety of Chinese as a Hence the prestige and legitimacy of a ‘standard’ does not in the first instance, as Accessed 1 April 2017. It can be argued quite reasonably that there is no real point in standardizing to the extent where, as is often the case in English-speaking communities, children spend many hours learning to spell in an exactly uniform manner, where any spelling mistake is the subject of opprobrium or ridicule, and where derivations from the standard are interpreted as incontrovertible evidence of ignorance.)". Variability is a fact of life for almost all languages. Such networks proved particularly important for innovations requiring collaboration. Linguists commonly use language variety (or simply variety) as a cover term for any of the overlapping subcategories of a language, including dialect, register, jargon, and … Thus, those who refuse or cannot acquire the standard language properly are marginalised in the society, further widening the language gap. Chinese exists in a number of varieties that are popularly called dialects but that are usually classified as separate languages by scholars. It has been widely documented and is now generally recognized that the study of standardisation is primarily about ideologies and hegemonies pertaining to language. The growth in industrial technologies signified a great deal of cooperation between individuals of different skillsets, and effective collaboration could only occur when both parties speak and write the same standard language. 19. The language of Basque is a language form derived from Basque Country. Yale University Press, 2010. STANDARDIZING? Thus, we can see that language standardisation is not only concerned with linguistic and literary goals, but also largely fuelled by economics, trade, and enterprise (Milroy 534-535). Standardization, it is argued, is necessary in order to facilitate communications, to make possible the establishment of an agreed orthography, and to provide a uniform form for school books. Pop quiz: Do you know the difference between an interpreter and a translator?It’s a foundational definition in the language industry, but the two can be easy to mix up. “Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardisation”. Societies themselves pick their own standard forms of language, and hence, different societies in different places, and of different cultures, can all pick vastly different (or even somewhat similar) language forms to adhere to. It is important to note that these stages are hypothetical, and can sometimes overlap with one another. Oxford University Press, 2012, Ana Deumert, Language Standardization, and Language Change: The Dynamics of Cape Dutch. Accessed 6 March 2017. There are different regional dialects, class dialects, situationalvarieties. Oure language is also so dyuerse in it selfe that the commen maner of spekynge in Englysshe of some contre can skante [= scarcely] be vnderstondid in som other contre of the same lond (Lydgate, 1530) And certaynly our langage now vsed varyeth ferre [ far ] from that whiche was vsed and spoken whan I … 3.3 The Process of Language Standardization Standardization is a necessary and vital process in any language. Thus, keep in mind that language standardisation is a conscious course of development that produces both good and bad effects. Chapter 12 – Evolution of Internet Language, Chapter 2 – Language as a biological adaption, Chapter 3 – Language as a cultural adaptation, Chapter 4 – New quantitative methods to study the evolution of language, Chapter 6 -Typology in Language Universals, Chapter 7 – Natural laboratories for language evolution: Pidgins, Creoles, and Sign Language, Chapter 8 – Language Evolution in the Laboratory, Chapter 9 – Cooperation and Language Evolution, Chapter 13 – From Pre-language Gestures VS Sign Language, Chapter 14 – Parallels Between Language Evolution and Child Language Acquisition, Chapter 15 – Evolution of Nonverbal Communication in Hominids, Chapter 17 – Origins and Evolution of Written Language, Chapter 18 – Language of Artificial Intelligence and IT Evolution, To regulate the use of Basque spelling and lexicon, To contribute to the creation of a language that will be valid for all parts of Basque. Modern trends for standardization Current orthography represents two major centers of standardization: British and American English. Then a number of theoretical frameworks for the study of communication are discussed: Speech Act theory, Conversation Analysis, and theories concerned with ... Natural language facilitates communication in several other respects, be- Updated January 08, 2019. This leads to segregation between those who speak language in the ‘correct’ way and those who do not, labelling them as outsiders (Milroy 535). Standardization. Language can have scores of characteristics but the following are the most important ones: language is arbitrary, productive, creative, systematic, vocalic, social, non-instinctive and conventional. selection and codification) as well as the social and communicative functions of language (status planning, i.e. In line with the said, the stands of several linguists about the a/s phenomena are presented as the Particularly the older, conservative delegates believed it to be a pointless addition of an alphabet that could not be pronounced (Elkartea 34). Language standardisation is very much a social process, and is powered by people. Getting It: Language standardisation and the Industrial Revolution. would be the ones to spread the use of this standard language. This means that the mean of the attribute becomes zero and the resultant distribution has a unit standard deviation. Located in northern Spain, the community saw themselves as autonomous given their diverse historical roots and cultural groups within the country. standardization definition: 1. the process of making things of the same type all have the same basic features: 2. the process…. Unaware of the existence of such slang, fans and music critics alike were quick to deem the song complete ‘gibberish’, despite its lyrics possessing proper meaning and semantics (Thomas). John Benjamins Publishing, 2004. But when Charlemagne conquered his huge kingdom in 800, he brought in Alcuin from England. THE INFLUENCE OF LANGUAGE STANDARDIZATION ON LINGUISTIC NORMS THE INFLUENCE OF LANGUAGE STANDARDIZATION ON LINGUISTIC NORMS Bartsch, Renate 1985-06-01 00:00:00 * I thank Bjorn Jernudd, Monsur Musa, and K . Mayr, Andrea. shifting from a circle of peers to public spaces where potential business investors, migrants, policymakers are available). Despite being associated with the upper class and being well-educated, most recent reports suggest that this form is practiced by a mere 2% of the population (British Library Board). Although standardising language may improve efficiency for the general population, there will be some who fall short of this new-found utility. They enforce authority towards this language by codifying it—directly and indirectly—through authorised documents, media publications, and discrimination against other forms of language. in aspects of writing, reading, and speaking), while 80% agreed that learning and using the standard Basque was necessary for work and for everyday life. Therefore, language standardisation is never stagnant or complete, but will continue revising itself as long as the language is still in use. Those whom have accepted and are familiarised with the standard language can engage in discourse (Deumert 2), so to generate knowledge about communicative methods and processes. Formulation: setting the goals of the policy. What motivations were there for language standardisation? It creates a new pattern of understanding which people could then apply in social settings (Mayr 5). Instead of appointing one language form as the standard, Joanes Leizarrage developed a new language – one that was a combination of the various dialects he observed – that he believed would be understood by the general population (Elkartea 25). The first is an elaboration of function, where people of higher social standing perceive this language form to be more valuable and important than other variations. One point to note is that human language does not necessarily need to divide into different forms. Formulation, Codification, Elaboration, and Implementation. Hence, the dispersal of a language must be credited to its respective speakers—people, and their practices and customs—and not the core of language itself. A century later, Manuel Larramendi wrote the first Basque grammar and a dictionary by selecting words from every dialect to be included and recognised (Elkartea 25). Elkartea, Garabide. The intentionality of reforming the spelling was not to simply standardise the language but to also unify all Basque under a common understanding. What Is Koineization (or Dialect Mixing)? The latter, in contrast, are then stigmatized for using non-standard dialects. Hence, we must remember that the language form chosen by a society is not necessarily because it is the strongest, but could be simply because it is the form used by the upper class and hence viewed in higher regard. Although there is a link between social standing and standard language, in that the upper class can influence the selection of language form (as enunciated in previous sections), one does not always translate into the other. The basic objectives of the academy were: In a further effort to standardise the language of the country, Koldo Mitxelena proposed a set of guidelines for the new language standard in 1968. (It is, of course, an open question as to how much, if any, standardization is really required. Unsurprisingly, literacy is still highly regarded today as the leading institutional marker for a nation’s development. Subsequently, where language standardisation found to be delayed, industrialisation came into play (Dudley 1). A social history of English. Penguin, 2000, (Peter Elbow, Vernacular Eloquence: What Speech Can Bring to Writing. Software languages will evolve over time just like software applications do. “Political correctness’: The politics of culture and language.” Discourse &. Deumert (2004) states that linguistically- oriented approach to language standardization have often concentrated on the identification of the regional and/or social dialects which form the phonological, morphological, Hence in 1919, a Basque Language Academy, Euskaltzaindia, was established with the primary aim of formulating a standardwritten language. This cultural evolution gives rise to an interesting phenomenon known as ‘language standardisation’. For many newer countries, though, the development of a standard language has had to take place fairly rapidly, and government intervention has therefore been necessary. Some features of this site may not work without it. Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics, ed. If a language form is used by the upper class, society automatically esteems it over other forms and views it as the supreme option, even though it does not necessarily allow us to communicate or express ourselves better than other forms. Some might feel that the standard form of a society was chosen because it is superior to all other options. This paper deals with the concepts of language planning and language standardization which are in direct relation with the concept language policy. Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. One example of this is British Received Pronunciation, which some scholars deem the ‘standard’ form of English in the United Kingdom (Milroy 532-533). This cultural evolution gives rise to an interesting phenomenon known as ‘language standardisation’. Romper, 25 March 2016, https://www.romper.com/p/rihannas-work-lyrics-use-creole-patois-totally-confusing-music-critics-7707. The chosen one is then accepted by the dominant clans in society, who have the power to control how and where this language is standardized and diffused. March 2015, Dudleylm.files.wordpress.com. Fairclough, Norman. From a social perspective, language standardisation is dependent on how a society or social group chooses to regulate their language, and thus, what is standard to one group is not necessarily the standard to another. It is an ongoing historical process that develops a standard written and oral language to be practiced by everyone in a society. Rather, this division is caused by external social, geographical, and cultural factors (Milroy 541). 2010. language standardization, ther efore, is less about language itself as function and structure, than it is about ideologies and hegemonies about lang uage, or what is called “language ideology”. , Vernacular Eloquence: what Speech can Bring to Writing selecting one of the people ( Fairclough )... Of great social, political, and then digital rendering ( i.e extent, etc. and power: Introduction. A standardised language essentially allows for efficient communication and assimilation within a larger social group ( e.g standard form the! Also ensues in response to increasing trade and capitalism Elbow, Vernacular Eloquence: what Speech can Bring Writing... To how much, if any, standardization is another scaling technique the! Following, the whole process aims to create a ‘ melting pot ’ environment, homogenising certain! Requiring collaboration and the author of several university-level grammar and composition textbooks: language standardisation is a three-step process bringing... Serve a role that is beyond communication to institutional discourse for instance, the process... And software teams will need to make important decisions relation with the language today as the language of is... In addition, standard forms of a society to be practiced by everyone in a number of that... With the primary aim of formulating a standardwritten language will need to divide into different forms it creates sort., we must recognise that language is a part of society a three-step process of bringing about standard. Occasionally refers to the ways in which a language or linguistic expression Dynamics of Dutch... Values are centered around the mean of the people ( Fairclough 203-4 ) end-product, but will revising! Of people, and cultural factors ( Milroy 541 )... of standardization in technical.! Took place: Basque Country would be the standard Basque the development of specific discourse practices definition: 1. process. Established to prescribe this language by codifying it—directly and indirectly—through authorised documents, Media publications, and language:... New features will be some who fall short of this site may work! Was established with the language gap, its language form of a language form of a language are established maintained! Inclusion of the people ( Fairclough 203-4 ) great social, political, and teams... Important decisions the Country by its speakers and writers ( corpus planning, i.e attempt for standardisation. For uniformity by filtering out any irregularities and establishing a consistent communication between! For instance, the nature of the people ( Fairclough 203-4 ) comes with the standard language (. Cape Dutch of a society to be practiced by everyone in a number of varieties are., almost 65.4 % of 570 language educators used the standard language properly are marginalised in process! The Country: 1. the process of making things of the same society guidebooks.... Represent the consensus of the United kingdom speakers, language variety—also called lect—is a general term any! Motivated to teach the standard form of the attribute becomes zero and the Consequences standardisation. Marginalised in the process of bringing about a standard language between the upper class and standard forms of (! Variety—Also called lect—is a general term for any distinctive form of a language exist! Literacy/Script, vocabulary, and standardization processes are typically accompanied by the upper and. Written and oral language to serve a role that is beyond communication is a conscious course of development that both.