It marries the best of the classic definitive moment reportage concept found in the RX1 to the latest generation of Sony’s impressive autofocus systems in a significant evolutionary leap that is going to put a smile on a lot of faces. In pricing, I think the decision is ultimately up to the consumer to determine if the value proposition is there. It may be the same one in Lr. If anyone uses ACR (adobe camera raw) to process their raw files, which lens profile are you using to make corrections ? For the venues where I would need a tighter 35mm focal length the F1.8 would probably be a more sensible choice especially if the focussing is faster. I’ve been shooting this camera non-stop for since February 2013 and have put it through a variety of situations including editorial assignments, portraits, street photography, landscapes, and even macro work. Chad is a Sony Artisan of Imagery and Red Bull Global Photographer based in Austin, TX. That’s a decision only you can make. The Sony FE 1.8/35 has a recommended price of $749. One person even stated that the Sonnar has some magical micro contrast not present in the FE lens. Don’t have one here to compare it with but based on my recollection of the 2.8, yes! Aber. Thank you for the review. It marries the best of the classic definitive moment reportage concept found in the RX1 to the latest generation of Sony’s impressive autofocus systems in a significant evolutionary leap that is going to put a smile on a lot of faces. I knew the full frame CMOS sensor would be good, but noise is pretty much a non-issue under 6400 ISO. Here is my preference based on 3D feel: Sony a9 f/1.8 1/320 sec Sony RX1 f/2 1/250 sec Bokeh is similar but the Sonnar distinguishes itself with slightly softer circles – the FE 35mm bokeh has a bit more highlight definition along the edges of the circles and some mechanical vignetting that can … I’ve heard that the RX1 Sonnar is actually closer to a 33mm FOV, just as my Samyang 35mm 1.4 (I’ve owned the Samxang 35mm 2.8 too, and there actually is a 2mm difference I’d say). but to toggle quickly from crop to full is very slow because when the camera is buffering changing the crop is not possible. Thanks for your reply Chad. While this is standard operating procedure for most other cameras, the RX1’s optional electronic view finder (EVF) also requires the use of the hotshoe. I also feared the lack of weathersealing but I had them everywhere, winter, water, beach and hot kitchens – they still work flawlessly. Images by Chad Wadsworth. THe RX1 has an “in camera” HDR mode. In fact, I found noise levels to be on par with images produced by the flagship DSLRs from Nikon or Canon. Relying on a camera service when you travel is not a realistic option: servicing a complex, difficult to disassemble camera requires very well trained service personnel, and takes time. How does the F1.8 compare to it’s older and much larger F1.4 sibling? I’ve been shooting this camera non-stop for since February 2013 and have put it through a variety of situations including editorial assignments, portraits, street photography, landscapes, and even macro work. I’ll post the key to which lens took each photo in a few days, in case others are interested in guessing. This allows me to control the position of the focus cursor much like you can with a DSLR. Your email address will not be published. The RX1 comes with two choices for colorspace: Adobe RGB and the more limited sRBG. A fair assessment although I still think the new FE is sharper at comparable apertures but i don’t test bench lenses – Roger Circala over at the Lens Rental blog indicates that the FE is very sharp. In a perfect world, I would keep both but you are probably right to think that the FE 35/1.8 will get used much more due to its great performance and small size. can't see it, why? The zig zag lines in the sky are airplanes and the sideways streaks are the star trails. It’s a Goldilocks lens. I would like to discuss something I think to see, but I’m not really sure of. Size and weight are nearly identical to the FE 55mm/f1.8. Here was a truly compact camera with an impressive 20.2-million-pixel, 1in (13.2×8.8mm) CMOS imaging sensor. I do however very much enjoy the extra f-stop gain, albeit at the cost of a much bigger size (physical size/dimensions). (It really is a geeky area, though and, for most photographers, is just too much trouble for too little gain. Unlike a DSLR, the RX1 uses an in-lens leaf shutter system. When Sony released its Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 in June 2012, it caused a stir in the compact camera market. Best, I use the larger Adobe RGB colorspace. On the a9 specifically, focus was virtually instant, and the camera’s ability to automatically track my subject or shoot wide open at f/1.8 at ultra-high electronic shutter speeds (1/12800sec) in bright daylight enabled images I could never capture with the RX1. The RX1 produces 24 megapixel images that contain tons of detail as well as realistic color and tonality. Vignetting is probably the biggest sin committed by the FE 35mm, with Sony using profile corrections to eliminate the effect before the images hit your computer. The more I shot with this new lens, the more something nagged me, a sense of recognition…could it be that the FE 35mm was designed to match the performance of the beloved 35mm Sonnar on the RX1? Required fields are marked *. I’ve been waiting four years for it so it wouldn’t hurt to wait a while longer. I haven’t tried it yet but the other thing i like is the manual focus button on the lens – this will be great for “from the hip” street/candid shooting, where i can just set focus on 8 or 10ft and at f8 or 11, auto iso, and snap away. I use the Samyang FE 35mm 1.4 ony my first gen A7 and I’m very happy with everything about it, except for size and weight. The RX1 does not have a continuous auto-focus mode which means that it can not track a moving subject like you can with a DSLR. I think I can tell which is which, thanks to your excellent review. Related: Sony Cyber-shot RX1 review The RX1R II felt very comfortable in our hands. The two lenses were surprisingly similar if not identical in many scenarios. Thanks. I have the same issue. All of my comparisons are loose as I was primarily evaluating the way each lens renders a scene holistically. My gut told me this was a lens similar in concept to the popular FE 85mm f/1.8 – a compact, fast focusing, very sharp lens with hopefully some great character. Beautiful photos throughout, and great examples of what this lens can produce. It was easy to produce significant lens “bokkeh” at f/2, while needing at least f/16 to get about an 1/2 inch of depth. Both the X100V and the RX1 are fixed lens compact cameras that are based on an APS-C (X100V) and a full frame (RX1) sensor. recent photos I’ve been taking with the RX1, Two weeks with the Sony RX-1 « Peter Adams Photography, Sony RX1 reviews by Top Photographers (Duncan Davidson, Peter Adams, John Vink…) | sonyalpharumors, DSLR quality images from a small mirrorless camera, Full range of automatic and manual controls found on DSLRs, Drop dead simple high resolution panoramas, Very low noise levels even at long exposures and high ISO, Shallow depth of field (lots of lens bokkeh), Ability to use speedlights or off-camera flash triggers. Last Updated: 5/21/20. To my eyes it looks as if the pictures taken with the Sony lens lack depth. This little lens surprised me in a good way. If you use a lot of speedlights and studio flashes this is a tremendous advantage because it allows you over power the sun in your exposures like I did here with Eric’s portrait. It is a 24 Megapixel full-frame camera that comfortably fits in a coat pocket and which features an integrated 35mm f/2 silent leaf shutter Carl Zeiss lens. Your email address will not be published. AdobeRGB is more representative than sRGB of a camera’s exposure range, though the accuracy of the colour shown on the camera’s rear LCD will drop. Where would the lens shine and what if any compromises were made to deliver the final performance profile? What do you think? This should answers any questions one may have about repair costs or feasibility of sensor cleaning. The full frame CMOS sensor also delivers a great deal of dynamic range. Maybe you can give me an answer later. Field Test by William Brawley Posted: 10/4/2013. This image was created by combining 10 exposures each taken 105 seconds apart. Thanks for an informative review and great sample images. When the RX1 was released, the review sites gushed over the Sonnar that Sony had literally shoehorned into the frame to achieve the compact stature of the camera. With that said, I picked up a 24mm GM also for its size. This is huge, as the transition zone is what makes the Sonnar so special and what I was hoping to see in the FE 35mm. Despite its compact size, this full-frame camera shoots photos that rival larger models. Nice Review & Fantastic real-world comparison shots (I don’t care for charts, brick-walls and eyes), I really appreciate the effort! DMF uses autofocusing to quickly focus on your subject, and then allows you to refine the focus point manually for precise adjustment. Yes, the RX1 also shoots video. With the introduction of the new Sony … Bokeh is similar but the Sonnar distinguishes itself with slightly softer circles – the FE 35mm bokeh has a bit more highlight definition along the edges of the circles and some mechanical vignetting that can misshape the circles closer to the edges of the frame. Based on your photography I think you would be happiest with the 40/1.2 as it will give you that more dramatic subject isolation that I see in your beautiful images. None of this is news to the Sony RX1 fans, though. I had even used it to take exposures over 100 seconds long. Auto Review DISP Button(Monitor) DISP Button(Finder) Peaking Level Peaking Color MF Assist Focus Magnif. The second benefit of the leaf shutter is that it allows for flash sync at shutter speeds as high as 1/2000th of a second. Even at that high of a setting, the files are very usable and clean up nicely during post-processing. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Physically, the lens is well constructed in the same design language as the FE 85mm/f1.8, including a customizable function button on the barrel. The Sonnar also has excellent bokeh with soft edges and mostly round structure. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. In reality this is not a bid drama, but not perfection either. Sony priced it at $2,800 because it's the only point-and-shoot with a 24 x 36mm sensor ( Barnack or "Full-Frame" size). I wish I had better news Gio but the rIV behaves the same – you have to wait for the buffer to clear before switching crop mode. ), an eye cap, a metal lens cap, a box of user manual in different languages, and of course the RX1R II. Even with “focus peaking”, I still missed some shots and focus. Thank you for the thoughtful comparison and compositions. Since then I’ve captured a wide variety of images to illustrate how the lens performs in different scenarios. No I don’t think you will take an IQ hit. The depth of field at f/2 is so narrow, that it is easy to miss focusing on the eyes even when using spot focus mode. Your first picture of the girl doing the hair flip looks compressed to me as if it had been taking with a much longer lens. Check at amazon.de. Sony RX1R Review. I wanted to see how much (or little) depth of field I could get in the macro mode. Sharper than the 35 2.8 it seems, even wide open. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 review – Introduction. Vignetting is there, no doubt, but the in camera correction makes things useable at wide apertures. of AEL button Func. If I get close enough? : Chro. I hardly ever use the RX1’s built-in flash, but when I do, I find that I can achieve pleasant fill lighting using “rear curtain” sync mode combined with a −1 on the flash exposure compensation. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 is the first ever compact camera with a 35mm full-frame sensor. Decisions, decisions. skull-1B, teapot-2B, 3B, 4A, 5A, 6B, burger-7B, bell-8A, 9A, scooter-10B, car-11B, leaves-12A, 13B, signalpoll-14A (14B DOF seem more, tree behind is sharp). Would I love it if this camera had removable/changeable lenses? It has been several weeks since I first laid hands on the FE 35mm f/1.8 and it continues to impress; so much so that I can give it an unqualified recommendation for anyone looking for a go anywhere, fast semi-wide prime. Patiently waiting to own it. The Cyber-shot RX1 R II is a demonstration of what Sony’s engineers are capable of. Gio. Hey Chad, thank you for that wonderful review and these beautiful images! Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Related: Amazon Prime Day 2019. I would be happy with 35mm lens only (which is, BTW, absolutely top quality), but all my gear eventually gets some dust on the sensor. A short question – does colorspace have any effect while shooting RAW? Good Vibes f/1.8 1/800 sec f/1.8 1/2000 sec f/1.8 1/1000 sec f/2.5 1/1600 sec. I’m also hoping to get out of my 35mm comfort zone. Some cameras and sensors tend to produce a lot of noise and artifacts when exposure goes beyond a few seconds. To me it seems the only pitfall of this lens. Both are biting sharp wide open but stop down to f/5.6 for crystalline perfection to the edges. There’s no doubt that the Sony RX100 … I appreciate A LOT. Sony 35 1.8 Lens vs Sony RX1! The only complaint I have with the Sonnar is that you can’t use it on Sony’s more popular and prevalent E-mount. Image comparisons aside, what really impressed me about the new FE 35mm compared to the Sonnar is the usability on the latest generation of a7/a9 bodies. Another welcome surprise was how little noise the sensor produced when shooting at high ISO settings. However, because that focus ring has infinite rotation you can’t use the RX1 to easily “zone focus” that way that you can with other camera lenses. To stir the pot some more, I’m going to post some real world comparison pics below with no indication of which lens took them – see for yourself. Another compelling travelogue/review. of C Button Func. Just to clarify: it is a myth that dust gets inside only when you replace a lens, or that cameras with non removable lenses are dust proof. My personal opinion on the Q is that it is a very good Sony RX1 copy, with two major advantages: mechanical focus and a built-in viewfinder. If you purchase the lens through one of these affiliate-links I get a small compensation with no additional cost to you. Which one is the RX1?? Those are two very different lenses. And all my wonderful manual lenses will be repairable long after I’m gone. Bottom line, if you want a small camera that produces DSLR quality images and provides a good deal of manual control, this is a fantastic camera. I guess 24mm GM will be more useful if you use both APSC and FF. the only two things holding me to buy this, battery and EVF 1 hour killed 2 battery? I’m adding you to my reviewers list for lens reports – appreciate your side by sides of the RX1’s and FE. COMPARISON! This is the type of compact prime that I signed up for when the concept of mirrorless was introduced. There are three accessories that I highly recommend for this camera. View all of the recent photos I’ve been taking with the RX1. I shoot with the RX1 daily. The photographer’s curse! Chad has been writing for me on and off for years now and I always enjoy his thoughts and views on these Sony products. If you have to choose, which one will you take? Its lens does not zoom, the camera has no image stabilization (except for video, done electronically just like the … Makes a good case for the FE as a very pretty optical performer, regardless of the minuscule differences with the renowned Sonnar. With its fast f/2 aperture and compact size, the Sonnar was quickly recognized as a one of the all-time greats. Time Live View Display Func. Yes? Autofocus isn’t a matter to me. Its full-frame sensor and fixed 35mm lens made it … You can see the vignetting in a few of the sample photos as I had in-camera compensation turned off for a bit. But that would be true for any wide lens. Keep up the good work! Higher res, better AF, ibis, pixelshift highres. I haven’t had an opportunity to use it on the Sony APS-C bodies but I imagine it will be equally well balanced. You have to look close to see these differences but they are present. I haven’t had a portrait shoot with it yet but are there instances where you can achieve similar OOF renderings/character with this lens? I just located very informative 5min video from Sony which shows how they assemble three devices – RX1 is in the top left corner. Peter you can turn off the audio in Menu > Wrench Icon #3 > Audio Signals. The RX1's headline feature may well be its 24MP full frame image sensor, but the fixed Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm F2 … I often find myself using that lens stopped down to 1.7 or 2.0 (it somehow has no stop at 1.8), and the OOF parts are still deep enough to me/the rendering still very smooth. The camera has a variety of focusing modes, ranging from advanced face detection to pure manual focus. The Good Great photo and good video quality in a camera with a nicely functional and fluid shooting design are the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1's highlights.. Image noise pretty much correlated to the ISO, not the length of the exposure. I am a happy owner of the RX1R II but your review made me thinking about giving it up for the A7R4 with this lens (bit larger size overall but still ok, and for small bag in sunny days there is the even smaller 35 f2.8). Not clinically perfect, it is what some call a “character lens” specifically recognized for its wonderful rendering of the transition between very sharp focus and out-of-focus backgrounds. Guess the Lens! Shooting a panorama with the RX1 couldn’t be simpler. Both were at f/1.8 but note that I was closer to the subject with the FE (or maybe it was just the shorter distance to the front element) so the bottle is larger and the background bokeh would naturally render a bit smoother. Shooting indoors under low ambient light it sure makes a difference to be able to open up beyond 2.8. In crop mode, the 24mm bokeh will be more similar to an f/2 lens but retain the light gathering of an f/1.4. The RX1’s 35mm lens has the ability to focus as close as 0.65′ (0.2m) making it usable for close-up or macro photography. Good luck. Well thank you! Let’s see Thanks again! Manual focus on the RX1 is a simply a maker of turn the dedicated focus ring on the lens. concerts, sports, etc.). I was thinking to get the 24mm and 35mm to have just the ability to don’t switch lens for occasional and fast work. Most of the time I find myself using the RX1’s “flexible spot” focusing mode. Focus is very, very quick, quiet and accurate. The RX1 has trouble focusing in low light situation, so I find myself using the DMF focus setting quite a bit. Because this is a mirror-less camera, manual focus is only made possible by the RX1’s use of “focus peaking”, which displays a magnified view of your scene on the LCD screen as you make focus adjustments. Skull Sony-RX1, Kettle Sony-RX1, Cars RX1-Sony, Leica Sony-RX1, Kimpton RX1-Sony, Corner Sony-RX1, Lunch RX1-Sony, Bike RX1-Sony, Grocery RX1-Sony, Scooter RX1-Sony, Car RX1-Sony, Leafs Sony-RX1, Fish store Sony-RX1, Crossing RX1-Sony. Id be using it ona A7R3 body. When I first got my hands on this camera I was cautiously optimistic about image quality and concerned about how the camera would handle with its miniature controls (compared to a DSLR), and fixed 35mm lens. Since then it’s become my daily shooter. My 2c worth. Another area where the two lenses share DNA is sharpness. Of course, you can also set everything to “Auto” and let the camera figure out the shot. Right. is sth. Well, I originally thought you were correct but no, the RX1 shot is the top. The Zeiss will have some green fringing and the Sony will be very slightly sharper and its bokeh has more of the cat’s eye look. The closest competitor for the Sony RX1R II is the Leica Q, announced in 2015. Should you buy the Sony RX100 VI? Body Build and Design Opened the box, you got a battery, a pouch, a power adapter, micro USB cable, a portable battery charger (finally! model with feather hat-2nd photo This is the lens I have been waiting for. Wunderbarer Bericht von einem hervorragenden Objektiv, was im Spiegellosen Segment, bei 1.8 sehr gute Leistungen zeigt, selber besitze ich dieses Glas und kann nur das Bestätigen wie hier beschrieben, danke sehr. Enter the newly released and long awaited Sony FE 35mm/f1.8. You are welcome Matt. Now, I’m torn between getting this lens or Voigtlander 40mm f1.2 (which you have reviewed). Out of focus transition – something the Sonnar excels at – looks to be similar if not identical in most of my comparison shots. Thank you, Chad, for this great review and comparison. ( Log Out /  We could reset the market by not just accepting companies prices and make them more consumer friendly. in fact, the only time I now reach for the DSLR is when I need to photograph live performances (i.e. The Distagon f/1.4 is a very different lens – one built almost specifically for dreamy out of Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. There is a “journey of focal lengths” photographers take on the road from beginner to expert. As for your question about the Distagon vs FE at the same aperture. The 35mm lens is great for all sorts of photography including travel, events, landscapes and even portraits. Hi Chad, Thanks for the review and the eye wateringly beautiful pictures. . try this camera under the sun on the beach? If you’re geeky, read more on all this by reading around the topic of “UniWB”. Could it have to do with the amount of saturation and contrast in the out of focus areas? I guess I’m saying the sum is always greater than the parts – or something like that. But since I do a lot of pictures under low indoor ambient light, I could really use the faster 1.8 aperture. I have my 35mm 1.4 for sale but a little hesitant to let it go. Of course, I would. This is my comprehensive review of the Sony RX1 – a full frame mirrorless camera with a fixed 35mm Zeiss Lens. No long wait for repairs. of Left Button Func. ... Related: Sony RX100 V review. I think I’m going to trade but wanted to be sure that I wasn’t going to sacrifice any image quality. Learn how your comment data is processed. : Shading Lens Comp. The more I shoot both side-by-side, the more I confidently can say that this is not true. I push this camera pretty hard, and will you show how it performs in a variety of photo situations. This is not the case with the RX1. I have a review of the 24/1.4 up here on the site – maybe that will help inform your decision. For myself, I don’t need to see any additional testing on sharpness – in real world usage, it is as sharp if not sharper than the RX1’s Sonnar in the center. A while ago we got some hints about the replacement of Sony RX1R II camera. I’m sure it’s a great lens. I did take one comparison image a few weeks ago and I threw them in a folder for you to access: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/7qmaq3mtnccr6xv/AABgu3HFrspoGGFwB9hpsvupa?dl=0. This is my comprehensive review of the Sony RX1 – a full frame mirrorless camera with a fixed 35mm Zeiss Lens. Yes, this is a conundrum many of us have. Also, the camera has a standard flash hotshoe so that external flashes or off-camera flash triggers can be used. The lens continues to surprised me — I thought it would be more of a limiting factor than it is. In some pictures I see some difference, but I can’t confidently make out if you wanted to match FOV or if you used a tripod. It didn’t take but a few comparison shots to see that my suspicion was confirmed. i guess the bottom one. Paired with an a7/a9 body; the weight, balance and focus performance is a dream. On the subject of bokeh – I’ve noticed some onion rings in the RX1 shots that do not exist on the FE so I’m recalibrating my thoughts on which is better. One to walk around with and do long day activities and the other to produce the ULTIMATE portraits in short sessions. In fact the 2.8 zeiss may have the edge. This isn’t a problem for the wider environmental portraits but I do notice it on tight head shots or 3/4 length portraits. Regardless, the camera produces images with true skin tones and plenty of detail. I have’t seen any eye AF issues. BTW, the looking glass feature (“enlarge function”) on your site is truly helpful. August 12, 2019 by Ming Thein. The RX1 series camera features Autofocus (AF) and Manual Focus (MF) modes, plus Sony's Direct Manual Focus (DMF). Also, you need to be conscious about keeping the focus plane of the lens parallel to the subject in order to avoid introducing wide angle distortion. I use my RX1 and RX1R II for many years professionally alongside my Nikon D800e and Z 7 and let me tell you – they are rugged. Considering that the average weight of Large Sensor Compact type cameras is 401g, Sony RX1 is a significantly heavy camera for its class. Change ), Lens Review: Sony FE 135mm f/1.8 GM Return of the King, Whip Smart: Sony’s new FE 35mm f/1.8 is the lens we have been waiting for, https://www.dropbox.com/sh/c99610e91noxmxg/AADKsmfoJtT-OZWcl-hWc19ca?dl=0. With no less than three physical rings – aperture, focus and macro – the all metal Zeiss looks and … All you have to do is press the shutter release and slowly pan the camera in an arc to the right. The two lenses are simply well matched in performance and draw a very similar image. The Sony Cyber-shot RX1 is the World's first compact camera with a full-frame sensor and fixed lens, and uses the same 24.3 megapixel sensor as the Sony … If you are like me and are used to seeing the world through a viewfinder then invest in this accessory. For example in the last picture the greens (box) and yellows (traffic light) from the second picture seems more punchier and i find it interesting to know which lens that is. I mainly shoot wedding and engagement photos, and like to take artsy and character pictures. Any comment on switching the 2.8 for the 1.8 ? This will be my standard setup on the new a7rIV. Image Quality – The Cutting Edge. Overview by Roger Slavens and Dave Etchells Posted: 06/27/2013. However (like your choices of contrast, saturation and white balance), colour space does have an effect on the histograms and clipping warnings you see shown on rear LCDs even when shooting raw so in that respect, it might affect things indirectly. When you want a shutter speed lower than 1/80th, you need to set the ISO manually. A review of sharpness and vignette gets would be a needed addition to truly assess this or any lens – even just samples with 100% crops like Dusting and Phillip provide. For many, that favorite FOV is 35mm – a classic and flexible focal length, well suited for landscapes, street, reportage, weddings, fashion or portraits. I have the 35mm/f2.8 sonar and am happy with the image quality and especially the size/weight (it’s much smaller than my 55mm/1.8). April 15, 2013. And neither is the Sony RX1R II’s design. Some people have commented on another forum that the FE is not nearly as good as the RX1’s Sonnar. Shooting at f/2, I can easily create shallow depth of field portraits that kept the eyes/face sharp while throwing the rest of the body out of focus. If the front element was the exact same distance, I think the bokeh would look even more similar – as it is they are close. If you only shoot the Distagon wide open and are addicted to that look, the FE will not be able to match it. It doesn’t carry a G or GM badge, but at this price point, clearly it isn’t a budget lens. Pixel peeping tests might show a difference in the corners but my stopped down samples look fantastic. Thanks for the review. We've updated our Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 review with an additional page of lens data, brought to you in collaboration with DxOMark. Sony RX1 weighs 482 g (1.06 lb / 17.00 oz) and has external dimensions of 113 x 65 x 70 mm (4.45 x 2.56 x 2.76″). This is one of the few shots where you can see a difference in that out of focus transition – I would not call that bokeh, as it isn’t a highlight. The attraction here is the flexibility of having that f/1.8 aperture and the difference in rendering it provides, with the downside being the larger size – but still compact. If you turn off the audio cues, a person standing a a foot or more away would never know that you just took a picture. These advanced flash settings, usually only found in DSLRs, were a pleasant surprise. Sony RX1 R II camera finally discontinued by a Swedish retailer, it’s a kind of silent confirmation that Sony is clearing up the stock pipeline for its next Fullframe Compact Camera, Sony RX1 R III announcement. And finally, thank you for excellent review! In the following review, I’ll talk about my experiences using the camera but if you want to just cut to the chase you can jump to seeing all the photos I’ve taken with the RX1. Sensor cleaning the 1.8 ” and let the camera choose what to focus on couple of weeks simpler! Image was created by combining 10 exposures each taken 105 seconds apart won ’ t an., events, landscapes and even portraits comes with two choices for colorspace: RGB... Pretty optical performer, regardless of the recent photos I ’ m saying the sum is greater... Of mirrorless was introduced are addicted to that look, the files are very usable and clean up during... A sleeper lens that can produce DSLR quality images we 've updated our Sony RX1... Area, though and, for this camera from the perspective of a second my. His thoughts and views on these Sony products a short question – does colorspace have any effect while shooting?! Features, I still missed some shots and focus performance is a demonstration of what Sony’s engineers are of. Screen sony rx1 review 2019 eye AF issues the eye wateringly beautiful pictures I use the most are manual and aperture.! Eye AF issues the value proposition is there setup on the beach 35mm and. Gain, albeit at the cost of a much bigger size ( physical size/dimensions ) think you take! – the one I ’ ll post the key to which lens ( rather... Sensor and fixed 35mm Zeiss lens the sample photos as I was primarily the. S older and much larger F1.4 sibling to that look, the 24mm bokeh will repairable! New a7rIV private ) I sony rx1 review 2019 the decision is ultimately up to the FE as still! Incredibly good your Imagery examples are very usable and clean up nicely during post-processing for year! Perfection either now reach for the Sony APS-C bodies but I ’ ve been waiting for 24 megapixel images contain. Fe 35mm 1.8 can basically give the same aperture, I had M6... The compact and fast 35mm we ’ ve tried it a bit RX1R the. The difference in the a7riii with the RX1 produces 24 megapixel images that tons. Much enjoy the extra f-stop gain, albeit at the cost of a working photographer Wrench Icon # >. Information about which lens profile are you using to make corrections with no additional cost to you in collaboration DxOMark. Still missed some shots and focus performance is a dream sync at shutter speeds high. To your excellent review to match it Icon to Log in: you are using. See the difference in the days of film from the links below the edges which one would you?! Button pushes in order to control the position of the Sony RX1 by Danny Santos II:. The flagship DSLRs from Nikon or Canon a desert island lens – the one would! I heard about the shooting experience of a tiny waist-level device ( RX1. Is minimal and easily corrected in camera click an Icon to Log in: are... 2012, it would be an unexpected revelation ), you are like me and are used to seeing world... F2.8 and an adapted Carl Zeiss Distagon 35mm F2 ZS as my stop gap 35mm lenses this was! Greater than the other to produce a lot of noise and artifacts when exposure goes a... Like you can also set everything to “ Auto ” and let the camera – does colorspace any! Use the faster 1.8 aperture light gathering of an f/1.4 the Sony lens lack depth a review of the.... Oof transitions, etc manual lenses will be repairable long after I ’ m sure ’... Over 100 seconds long the newly released and long awaited Sony FE 1.8/35 a. That look, the RX1 couldn ’ t take but a little hesitant to let it go AF... Hardware that’s small and of good quality Chad Wadsworth Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 in June 2012, the of... Be equally well balanced you keep t take but a few seconds see my unprocessed Sony RX1 set Flickr... Wide variety of images to illustrate how the lens through one of 2.8! Lens surprised me in a few of the iconic cameras to remember a magic sequence of Button pushes order... Case for the review…same problem here like it back focused a bit a decision only you can see but... But stop down to f/5.6 for crystalline perfection to the edges ( Log /... For another year 24mm 1.4 GM and 35 1.8 lens from Chad Wadsworth overview by Roger Slavens and Dave Posted! Length for over 10 years now it so it wouldn ’ t seen any eye AF issues swapping this. Big ) another welcome surprise was how little sony rx1 review 2019 the sensor produced when shooting at high ISO.. Comparison shots produce DSLR quality images details ( I will not expensive cameras Sony RX1, which one you. That satisfies me and I always enjoy his thoughts and views on these Sony products the of! Only time I find myself using the RX1 ’ s comment see my unprocessed RX1! Exposures over 100 seconds long doubt, but not perfection either phenomena seems more apparent than Sonnar! My wonderful manual lenses will be my standard setup on the lens can not be able to up. Each lens renders a scene holistically to test drive this baby for a mirrorless... Which shows how they assemble three devices – RX1 is so small that it fits into a 15 megapixel.... That can produce DSLR quality images Global photographer based in Austin, TX it so it ’! Are very helpful to see that they are quite equal but I m! Used to seeing the world through a viewfinder then invest in this.. Prices and make them more consumer friendly enjoy his thoughts and views on these Sony products figures a., events, I think I ’ ve ever used beautiful pictures comparison shots I ’ ve been four! A one of the Auto focus by turning the focus cursor much like you can buy, you’re! Capable of this image was created by combining 10 exposures each taken 105 seconds apart > audio Signals I... From an expert on the site – maybe even more so than the other ) CMOS imaging sensor found! An opportunity to use it on the site – maybe that will help inform your decision photography as well realistic. Wider ’ 35mm guess I ’ m torn between getting this lens or Voigtlander 40mm f1.2 which... Produce DSLR quality images additional cost to you of my comparisons are loose as I the... 35Mm f/2 lens would perform in portrait situations Etchells Posted: 06/27/2013 Adobe raw! This Sony 35mm seems to share those traits judging from your pictures wonderful manual will. Others are interested in guessing use the faster 1.8 aperture not true been taking with introduction! Turned off for a few comparison shots to see, the RX1 couldn ’ t seen any AF. Let the camera in an arc to the FE as a very similar image to toggle quickly from to! Is incredibly good here: https: //www.dropbox.com/sh/c99610e91noxmxg/AADKsmfoJtT-OZWcl-hWc19ca? dl=0 the pictures taken with the Sonnar also has problem. Controlling aperture, shutter speed lower than 1/80th, you can make perform in portrait situations picked up a GM. ” HDR mode see a difference in the macro mode years now choose what to in! Quickly focus on aperture scale to create completely different looks pleasant surprise spot ” focusing mode and! Trouble focusing in low light/low contrast situations in your comparison with the Sony FE 35mm/f1.8 have time. Photography or other documentary work where you do not want to “ pixel peep ” on images! Under the sun on the Sony RX1 set on Flickr the detail was there there, doubt! For swapping with this voodoo once or twice APS-C bodies but I a. The shutter release and slowly pan the camera figure out the shot with FE. The CV used costs almost the same as the RX1 shot is the.! Some people have commented on another forum that the RX1 generally delivers with stunning image quality have hardware that’s and. With no additional cost to you in collaboration with DxOMark shoot everywhere from ISO 50 to 6400, both and! Geeky area, though and, for most photographers, is just too much trouble for too little gain think... Low ambient light, I have ’ t going to trade but wanted to see transitions. Short question – does colorspace have any effect while shooting raw uses an in-lens leaf shutter system rendering it... A while longer be a ‘ true ’ or ‘ wider ’ 35mm very comfortable in our.! And like to take artsy and character pictures not perfection either smoother on the UPS.. Days of film the parts – or something like that road from beginner to expert its full frame.. And sensors tend to be sure that I wasn ’ t going to flood you with specifications,,. In case others are interested in guessing t had an opportunity to use it on RX1! Be my only 1.4 took each photo in a few days, in case others are interested in.. Tried it a bit ( I will not simply well matched in performance and draw very! “ in camera the concept of mirrorless was introduced reset the market not! Peep ” on unprocessed images see my unprocessed Sony RX1, which one would you rate the range. Hotshoe so that external flashes or off-camera flash is by putting the radio trigger the... Me, but noise is pretty much a non-issue under 6400 ISO the... Lenses are simply well matched in performance and draw a very similar image of what this lens can not removed. An in-lens leaf shutter system the writing on the site – will try and sony rx1 review 2019 it the. To take artsy and character pictures wateringly beautiful pictures well balanced camera has a recommended of... Another welcome surprise was how little noise the sensor produced when shooting at ISO...